howldog wrote:
> On 15 Mar 2005 13:21:36 -0800, "bluesmama"

> wrote:
>
> >
> >howldog wrote:
> >> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 20:52:51 GMT, Grizzlie Antagonist
> >>  wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:20:40 GMT, Spectre 
wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>Yeah thats where you really see the difference -
women have much
> >weaker
> >> >>arms. Basketball, football, rugby, Softball - they all look
> >pathetic
> >> >>when throwing. These are men's games, fine tuned for men, the
size
> >of
> >> >>the field, the rules were created for men.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >You and others seem to be implying that if women designed and
> >> >fine-tuned sports, it would be possible to conceive of a sport
where
> >> >women excelled over men.
> >> >
> >> >But sports are all about size, strength, stamina, speed, etc.
What
> >> >sort of sport could women design that would enable them to excel
> >over
> >> >men?
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Bob Costas voice:
> >>
> >>
> >> "and here we are at the ABC Wide World of Gestation
Championships"
> >
> >"Look at the spin she's getting on that 12-pounder.."
>
>
> "the thrill of victory...... and the agony of the 15 pounder"
>
>
> "ut oh! the French judge is demanding a C section!"

My husband says sports are watered-down war games, hence their appeal
to many men. I like the drama of football, and enjoy watching it, and
love to go bowling, but that's about as far as it goes. My girls are a
study in contrasts, one will be trying out for a cheerleader spot for
sure, the other will be fighting to get on the offensive line, she's a
tough little thing.

Nice c-section quip. Damn those European judges.



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/16/05 12:57:25 AM ---