stanfieldsarah{at}yahoo.com wrote:

>
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2005/02/24/national/a095250S07.DTL
> 
>
http://forum.cinchouse.com/eve/ubb.x/a/tpc/f/8446021315/m/1031060451/r/6081009651
> 
> Actually Dustbin,
> 
> There seems to be a dispute about how she got pregnant. The father says
> that it is the result of theft and she denys this saying they had the
> child through sexual intercourse. The court did not award the father
> any monies but instead decided to give him his day in court. He can
> argue his point and then he can formally be denied, but the court will
> allow him to argue the point so that there can be a decision handeed
> down on the matter. The Judge may dismiss with prejudice or they may
> let it go to trial, either way the issues here has not even been
> resolved the court has only allowed the father to continue the suit,
> whether he will or not is a different matter.
> 

Your comment appears to be a response to me, but 
your position in the thread indicates a response 
to Hyerdahl. From there one step further back is 
to MCP's original post!

Sorry.

D.


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/16/05 12:57:25 AM ---