-=> In a message to Zackery Lanphere, John Sampson said... <=-
 JS> However, regardless of 'ole Lonely Bill's plight, it does not justify 
 JS> subornation of perjury, perjury itself, obstruction of justice, and
 JS> witness  tampering. THESE are the issues that will get him in trouble.
 JS> NOT the fact  that, to quote one of our staff attorneys here in Denver,
 JS> "diddled" the  intern. 
     I absolutely agree that it does not justify any perjury, obstruction of
 justice, or witness tampering that went on.  I also do not think that it
 justifies the illicit actions he has undertaken.  Understanding *why*
 someone does something doesn't necessarily indicate approval of said
 actions.
 
 JS> One other point. There had been some evidence to suggest that Hillary
 JS> had  been intimate with the late Vince Foster. If that is in fact the
 JS> case, then  it calls in question the theory that Hillary wouldn't be
 JS> intimate with a  male. 
     That is indeed interesting.  I hadn't heard anything about that in the
 past.  Obviously Hillary is not totally opposed to normal contact with
 males, we know it happened at least once as Chelsea would tell us.  Unless
 of course she relied on technology. :)
      This is all very soap operatic.  It boggles my mind to think of the
 depravity these people are capable of.
     -Zack
... C:\CLINTON\TRUTH.COM not found--(A)bort, (R)etry, (I)mpeach?
---
---------------