From: "Robert Comer" 

> So the result of the reproduction is an "it"?

Whatever it is, it's not a new species.

--
Bob Comer


"Bill Lucy"  wrote in message
news:MPG.1de925f01766f625989743{at}news.barkto.com...
> In article , email{at}from_Gary_Britt.org says...
>> That 1 out of 1000 still produces what is effectively an infertile animal
>> because they are still incapable of reproducing their own kind.
>
> So the result of the reproduction is an "it"?

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5