RS> Yes, but thats a completely separate issue to fall forward which was
RS> always part of V32bis, tho optional. Yes, quite a few modem manufacturers
RS> didnt initially implement it, but plenty did too, not just USR.

SA> Maybe when the manual was printed it was true?.

Nope, it wasnt actually.

And when they are trying to make a claim for something they claim
that only USR does in a V32bis modem, they had better fix that claim
if others do it too, otherwise thats getting very close to deception.
Tho they would certainly be welcome to claim they were first if they were.

SA> Like at one time USR was the only one (or near enough) with V.34
SA> and/or V.34+ and 64 state trellis encoding, split speeds..  Or Am I wrong?.

Well, we were specifically discussing fall forward and V32bis, not V34.
@EOT:

---