From: "Patriot Games" 

"Paul Duca"  wrote in message
news:C22B2288.EBF7%p.duca{at}comcast.net...
> in article QgdNh.2864$un.2155{at}trnddc03, Patriot Games at
> Crazy_Bastard{at}Yahoo.com wrote on 3/24/07 1:32 PM:
>> "Paul Duca"  wrote in message
>> news:C229FD44.E8C3%p.duca{at}comcast.net...
>>> in article Q2RMh.14$un.7{at}trnddc03, Patriot Games at
>>> Crazy_Bastard{at}Yahoo.com
>>> wrote on 3/23/07 9:59 AM:
>>>> "Paul Duca"  wrote in message
>>>> news:C2289E3A.E14A%p.duca{at}comcast.net...
>>>>> in article ZUyMh.10382$8B1.5144{at}trnddc04, Patriot Games at
>>>>> Crazy_Bastard{at}Yahoo.com wrote on 3/22/07 1:19 PM:
>>>>>> "Free Lunch"
 wrote in message
>>>>>> news:hhe303ho10923ag7ia800kiiqr79f430t6{at}4ax.com...
>>>>>>> On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:30:47 GMT, in alt.atheism
>>>>>>> "Patriot Games"
 wrote in
>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>> "thomas p."
 wrote in message
>>>>>>>>
news:1174429846.481190.298540{at}e1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>> On 20 Mar., 19:00, "Patriot
Games" 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "Free Lunch"
 wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>
news:59otv2dbqtdocspvvl9hnnu6jd9mk5a904{at}4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:06:33
GMT, in alt.atheism
>>>>>>>>>>> "Patriot Games"
 wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>> "raven1"
 wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>
news:uitrv29ob3gkte8cf007g2r6fdbkntk5jd{at}4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18 Mar 2007
17:19:30 -0700, "Sound of Trumpet"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vatican Prelate:
Catholics will "do everything possible" to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prevent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Homosexual Civil Unions
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree. The idea of
gay "civil unions" is ridiculous: gay
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *marriage*
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is the answer.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fag "marriage"
is impossible.  Marriage is only for a man and a
>>>>>>>>>>>> woman.
>>>>>>>>>>> It's a social convention.
>>>>>>>>>> No, its not a
"convention" its a tradition, a heritage, invented
>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>> men
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> women FOR men and woman.
>>>>>>>>> It makes no difference if it is called
a convention, a tradition
>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> heritage.  As you say, it was invented
by men; therefore men can
>>>>>>>>> change it, as they have changed other
things that existed for
>>>>>>>>> thousands of years.
>>>>>>>> And "men," not fags, have made
it clear that it won't be changed by
>>>>>>>> banning
>>>>>>>> Fag Marriage in 37 states.
>>>>>>>>>>> There's no reason to refuse to give the
>>>>>>>>>>> benefits and responsibilities
of marriage to gays.
>>>>>>>>>> I happen to agree (to the angst of
all my conservative friends)
>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> "benefits and
responsibilities" could be given to fags SO LONG AS
>>>>>>>>>> its
>>>>>>>>>> never
>>>>>>>>>> called "Marriage."
>>>>>>>>> There is no rational reason not to
call it marriage.
>>>>>>>> Of course there is.  Marriage = Man + Woman.
>>>>>>> Really? So the plural marriages of the Bible
didn't happen?
>>>>>> The topic is FAGS.  If you'd like to discuss
POLYGAMY then feel free
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> swish your blasted ass over there and start a new Thread.
>>>>>>> Still, there's nothing that stops the legal
definition from allowing
>>>>>>> gays to marry. Nothing at all.
>>>>>> Other than it ALREADY being BANNED in MOST of America....
>>>>>>>> Fags can call it anything they want, they
can even invent a brand
>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>> word,
>>>>>>>> but the M-word ("Marriage") is
already reserved for Men-Women.
>>>>>>> Please keep your religiously inspired bigotry
from making it
>>>>>>> impossible
>>>>>>> for you to think.
>>>>>>>> Perhaps they call it Marriage in your
Cocksucker Country?
>>>>>>>> Not here.
>>>>>>> Once again, a supposedly moral person makes it
quite clear that he
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> quite immoral and full of hate. You clearly
have no use for Jesus's
>>>>>>> teachings.
>>>>>> Stop whining, God still loves you.
>>>>> So...it's not like He kept Mrs. Games' tits from sagging.
>>>> Nope, He really didn't help with that at all.
>>>> He doesn't do a lot of things we mistakenly think He should.
>>>> Instead, a healthy lifestyle and a little nip-n-tuck took
care of that.
>>> What would you have done if you couldn't afford to do that...or
>>> trade her in on something young and firm?
>> I never had to consider that option so I have no idea....
>        So she is at least a good Christian doormat?

I don't even know what that means but I suspect its steeped in jealousy...

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag