connor_a{at}hotmail.com wrote:

> "He gives me money for the kids, but if I had money I wouldn't have to
> do any of this [WORK]."
>
> http://entertainment.news.com.au/story/0,10221,12561816-10431,00.html
>
> Well, its about time all CS payments went to the kids in the form of
> clothing, school books etc. If the ex-sexer can't feed the kids, she
> shouldn't have 'em in the first instance.
>
> The primary breadwinner should in all fairness have custody of the
> children, since he is the superior provider.
>

Unfortunately, if men became the principle
carers they would, in almost all cases, have to
give up work and so lose the income that makes
them the priciple provider.

D.


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/16/05 8:57:24 AM ---