MCP wrote:

>
http://www.users.bigpond.com/sarcasmo/sexpolitics/violenceagainstmen/violence%20against%20men%20-%20Australia%20Says%20So.htm
> 
> Information for feminists, the politically correct and the naive, on the
> fact that women are frequently violent and abusive... as well as narky,
> belligerent, whiny, simpering and cunning. Wake up and smell the hypocricy.
> The Australian Government claims to believe that families are the backbone
> of a strong and healthy community, and loving supportive relationships are
> at the heart of happy, well functioning families. Of course that rhetoric is
> all very well, but what is the reality on the ground, in terms of government
> and social policy.

What do you expect? We are all the products of 
our childhood conditioning. These people have 
been brought up on the idea that little girls 
are made of sugar and spice and all things nice 
while we males are made of snips and snails and 
puppy dog tails.

Your conditioning lasts a very long time and 
incidiously infects your every thought. When 
experience is sufficient to over-rule that 
conditioning you can change - but many never do 
- and the bitches know it and use it to their 
advantage.

D.

> Well, governments throughout the western world are falling over themselves
> to appease a feminist (and in some ways a blinkered traditional) view of
> sexual power. Men are violent. Women are not. As a consequence we have the
> interesting phenomenon of worldwide campaigns against sexual discrimination
> and violence...unless it is against men. Violence against women=bad.
> Violence against men=so?!
> 
> The role, rights and powers of men has been seriously affected by changes to
> family structures and characterisations of male identity. We are in some
> ways a vulnerable gender, disadvantaged in family courts and in educational
> outcomes. Yet we have taken the rap for all evils in the world. Domestic
> violence gets treated like it is just a man-thing. That's even though there
> is plent of evidence that women are frequently domestically violent.
> 
> The Australian Prime Minister John Howard, can't admit to this however. He
> is good mates (an underling) with the Sex Discrimination Commissioner, Prue
> Goward. She's a feministagogue who doesn't tolerate male dissent. Makes you
> think about the term "power behind the throne" doesn't it!
> 
> But if you think the Liberals are pussies in this country, wait till you see
> the Australian Labor Party opposition. They are even bigger suckups.
> 
> Propaganda with a one-sided view of sexual violence, promoted by governments
> and power elites, is designed to brainwash young people and leads to them
> developing a false understanding about reality, about rights and wrongs. The
> Prime Minister says that "violence against women is
unacceptable". Violence
> against both men and women should be unacceptable. It diminishes the lives
> of all those it affects and it tarnishes any community that tolerates it.
> 
> Not John Howard (Pussy-in-Chief of a diminished community)
> 
> 


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/16/05 8:57:24 AM ---