| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: ATM 5 micron or not? |
From: "Dwight K. Elvey"
To: atm{at}shore.net
Reply-To: "Dwight K. Elvey"
>From: "Scott Berfield"
>
>Hi,
>
>After another bout of scratch removal (don't ask -- it involves the
>spouse being "helpful" and we don't want to go there) I am
now back to 9
>micron. I have seen people argue for both stopping at 9 and also for
>going ahead to 5 as a final stage of fine grinding. Any opinions?
>
>Also, I have some grits labeled 1000 and 2500. How would these (grayish
>colored) relate size-wise to the 15, 9, and 5 micron aluminum oxide
>grits?
>
>-sb
Hi
My understanding is that 2500 is about 10 micron. You may
find that the 10 micron aluminum oxide produces a smoother finish because
the carbide is made of sharper chuncks.
I've seen little difference in time from 10 micron to
polished for going to 5 micron first and then polish, compared with just
the 10 and then polish. The risk of scratching is much greater with 5
micron as well. Dwight
--- BBBS/NT v4.00 MP
* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/1.100)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.