On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 00:08:14 GMT, Douglas Berry
 wrote:

>On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 22:35:51 GMT, wbt{at}privacy.net drained his beer,
>leaned back in the alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly proclaimed the
>following
>
>>>Soldiers given administrative discharges are not moved out of their
>>>units unless there is a damn good reason, for example the soldier's
>>>life is in danger.  Since getting out of the Army requires a lot of
>>>paperwork at the battalion level, moving them would be pointless.  It
>>>takes about a week to clear a post, if you work hard and haven't lost
>>>any issue equipment.
>>
>>Military personnel are often removed from their units to be discharged
>>in other than honorable conditions. If they are section eighted, or
>>shit canned for disciplinary reasons or the unit is deployed...and
>>every grunt that has ever served knows there are dozens of other
>>reasons for what you say CAN"T HAPPEN, happening.
>
>Section 8?  You watch too much MASH.
>
>As I said, a damn good reason.  A unit deploying overseas would be
>one.  A medical reason would be a good one.  Being gay is not a good
>one.  I used to be a NCO.  I've dealt with administrative discharges
>before.
>
>>>Show me the Army regulation mandating that soldiers being separated
>>>for homosexuality be placed in opposite-sex barracks.
>>
>>Did I say Army, Shit for Brains? Did I specifically mention any branch
>>of the Armed Forces, Ass-Wipe?
>
>Show me in the UCMJ then.  You do realize that each service makes its
>own rules.  I'm most familiar with the Army rules.
>
>>>Since the Army doesn't have gender-specific barracks, this will be a
>>>long search for you.
>>
>>Your ass is hanging out 3 miles, boy. Instead of kicking it so far up
>>between your shoulder blade that you'll have to take your hat off to
>>shit, I'll just watch your foolish ASS bump on down the hard road.
>
>How many years did you serve, and are you ready to post your DD-214 to
>back it up?  Segregated barracks for units with both genders are
>things of the past.  Separate latrines, and same-sex rooms, but
>soldiers mingle in the halls.  We're soldiers, we can control
>ourselves.
>
>I'll wait for the UCMJ references along with those fertility laws you
>said existed.

Contrary to what you have stated the UCMJ  doesn't vary from service
to service. Do you think the Navy still operates under Reefs & Shoals?
You know nothing about the making of civil law. You know nothing about
military service and jurisprudence --- YOU KNOW NOTHING! I'm had just
about enough of your boring ignorance, boy. You too will drop off the
reading list if you fuck up once more.


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 4/4/05 1:00:49 AM ---