"bluesmama" (onebluesmama{at}gmail.com) writes:
> Viking wrote:
>> On 3 Apr 2005 19:13:55 GMT, dg411{at}FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Andre Lieven)
>> wrote:
>>
>> >> A male is not a man,
>> >
>> >A male cat is a male, a male human is a *man*.
>>
>> Andre's got it right.
>
> No, he doesn't.

Well, considering that you're a man hater, we just consider the
source of your cow shit. So, you're wrong... again.

> I asked what differentiated a male from a man; was it something extra?

Yes, you idiot: HUMANITY ! Duh !!

> Because in your post, you implied a distinction between Hyerdahl's
> "men" guests and your own description of a "man",
calling them "males"
> but not "men".

Then, you should have...*left that part it*, eh, oh illiterate dipshit ?

> I'm just asking what that distinction is, and would like to hear your
> thoughts on it, if you are inclined to take the question as seriously
> as it was intended. Obviously, they weren't male cats, unless "pussy"
> was your intended, or unintended, implication.

That some MS-use the term " males " as a " denigration alone
" deal
in no way invalidates my point. That *you* tried to, only shows your
hate of *men*.

Andre



--
" I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. "
                                    The Man Prayer, Red Green.


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 4/3/05 9:00:37 PM ---