Deborah Terreson wrote:
> In article  ,
> "Hyerdahl"  wrote:
>
> >
> > Deborah Terreson wrote:
> >> In article 
,
> >> "Hyerdahl"  wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Viking wrote:
> >> >> On 29 Mar 2005 07:04:46 -0800, "Hyerdahl"

> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >The use of scissors to make fun of RAPISTS is
not quite the
same
> > as
> >> >> >discriminating against men...unless...of course,
you believe
ALL
> > MEN
> >> >> >ARE RAPISTS?  Surely, that cannot be so, Phil.
> >> >>
> >> >> That was obvioulsy the point, hyperdung, that all men are
rapists.
> >> >> Hence the general pointing of scissors. Can't you ever even
> > attempt
> >> > to
> >> >> think straight???
> >> >
> >> > The point of the scissors was to cut off rapist'd dongs.  The
only
> > way that could be stretched to "all men" is either if that group
said
> > it did or if you are interpreting that way, meaning that YOU think
all
> > men> are rapists.
> >>
> >> The U.N.H Campus Lesbians do.

Prove it, "Deb".


Nice try Parg, in trying to wiggle out
> > of> turning the ideology they have on it's head and making it what
the
> > men in>> this NG think.
> >
Unless they have PROOF that this was the intention of the group, by
something the group has said, it is all about the bitter boys here and
their interpretation.


> Again, I saw zero, zip about those women making the statement that
all
> men are rapists.
>
> Come on Parg, you can do better than that.

I don't need to DO "better" since you're the one with no proof.  These
feminists were clearly speaking of rapists.
>
> > The bitter boys here seem to be inferring that all
> > men are rapists because the scissors were aimed at rapists and NOT
at
> > the fathers, brothers or lovers of these feminists.
>
> Got news for you: These women have few men who love them.

So say you?  Hon, from a man pretending to be a woman I'd need some
proof and not just your say-so.

Radical lesbians,> my dear, view men as dirty.

Have you ever MET any "radical lesbians"?  Besides, most NOW members,
according to a study, a few years ago, were found to be married with
children.   Anyhoo...lesbians have little reason to hate men since they
spend so little time with them. :-)

 This group is known in Durham and Portsmouth> (where I live) as being
quite... ummm. strident in their disdain for men.

So, everyone in Durham and Porsmouth hates men?  Nah, I can't believe
that.
Besides where's your PROOF that these fems were talking about men in
general instead of rapists?


>> All sex is rape, all men are rapists. As painful as it is for you,
> > remember
> >> your Andrea Dworkin and Kathleen Mackinnons dear.
 >
> > 'Deb', Dworkin and Mackinnon were not AT this party, nor were they
> > mentioned in the article.  Apparently, all feminists look alike to
you.
> >  :-)
>
> Look alike? Not at all!

Or think alike.  This group was strictly talking rapists, so if you
think all men are rapists....be my guest.
>
> And yes, Dworkin and Mackinnon were there in spirit, my sweet.

Hon, I don't mix religion with facts.  I'd still need proof and you,
like a man in a canoe without a paddle are struggling to find any.

> Again, do you KNOW this crowd? I do.

No you don't 'Deb'.  You're still waiting to discover that thing
between your legs is  a dong, perhaps not a long dong, but it doesn't
come off every time you change your puppet.  Hint:  there's no there
there, and the proof that they were speaking of rapists is there.
Win-win.

>



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 4/3/05 9:00:37 PM ---