Deborah Terreson wrote:
> In article  ,
> "Hyerdahl"  wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >> >> >
> >The point of the scissors was to cut off rapist'd dongs.  The
> > only way that could be stretched to "all men" is either if that
group
> > said > it did or if you are interpreting that way, meaning that YOU
think
> > all> men> are rapists.
> >> >>
> >> >> The U.N.H Campus Lesbians do.
> >
> > Prove it, "Deb".
>
> Ooop. Here comes the quotation marks around my name again...

That's right;  I'd need proof of your sex/gender as well, if you want
those marks off, dear.

>
> Are you going to start to call me a man?

You know I think you are a man.  If you can't prove it, might as well
get off the subject, just like the subject of this post,eh?  Looks like
you girl pretenders can't prove anything, right?
> >
> > Nice try Parg, in trying to wiggle out
> >> of> turning the ideology they have on it's head and making it what
 > the>> > men in>> this NG think.
> >> >
> > Unless they have PROOF that this was the intention of the group, by
> > something the group has said, it is all about the bitter boys here
and
> > their interpretation.
> >
> And if in this case, the general drift of the men out here might be
correct
> about this? What then?

So now you've gone from saying that you KNOW what the group intended to
scouting out the "general drift" of what the men here think, we KNOW
you've lost the debate dear.  No proof is still no proof whether it's
about your sex/gender or about your point.  You have none.

> >Again, I saw zero, zip about those women making the statement that
> all>> men are rapists.
> >>
> >> Come on Parg, you can do better than that.
> >
> > I don't need to DO "better" since you're the one with no proof.
These
> > feminists were clearly speaking of rapists.
>
> So why did they want the 'man' to leave?

There were OTHER MEN there, idiot.  The one man they asked to leave was
a reporter on a right wing rag.
> >>
> >> > The bitter boys here seem to be inferring that all
> >> > men are rapists because the scissors were aimed at rapists and
NOT
> > at> the fathers, brothers or lovers of these feminists.
> >>
> >> Got news for you: These women have few men who love them.
> >
> > So say you?  Hon, from a man pretending to be a woman I'd need some
> > proof and not just your say-so.
>
> WHOOP! There it is! *Yawn* Oh dear. I seem to be getting under your
skin,
> aren't I?
> >
No, without proof there is nothing to put under my skin.  All you have
is smoke and mirrors, and I've just uncovered both of them.

(edit)
>



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 4/4/05 5:00:55 AM ---