Aardvark wrote:
> this is more of ray mistakenly thinking that he can change anything
> signifigant in his world and then take credit for it. of course
nothing
> is changing or will change but that hasn't stopped him from already
> trying to take credit for something that's not going to happen.
>
> if you can *really* appreciate humor it's funny as hell, if you can't

> then it's just real sad.
>
>
>
> aardvark

Let's assume for a moment that there really are men who have a knack
for seducing exotic dancers. And let us suppose that a couple of those
men saw an opportunity to sell books and concoct a "system" that they
sell to other men who believe that this "system" will work for them
too. Does that mean that any drooling goober can utilize this "system"
and achieve the same results? Could a marketable number of men be dumb
enough to believe that their own personal charisma and looks are not
going to be heavy factors in these alleged systematic seductions?

It doesn't make sense.

It also seems that Ray makes fortuitous choices in whom he will grant
credibility. Just because one chooses to believe what one wants to
believe doesn't automatically embue one's choices with rational
"credibility". Obviously, the "guru" is attempting to sell his
"system". His financial interests are driving the promotion od his
"system".

Aren't these things rather obvious?

Kate C.

> kate wrote:
> >>"Kate" is so predictable: "she" can't
address the points of my
posts
> >
> > so
> >
> >>"she" replies with typical ad-hominems.
> >
> >
> > You're not making any real points. Other than to assert that not
paying
> > the dancers will cause them to fuck the clients. Which is
ridiculous.
> >
> >
> >>The men who claim to get laid in strip clubs without tipping are
the
> >
> > ones
> >
> >>with far more credibility than she.
> >
> >
> > To you they are because you want to believe that it will help you
in
> > some way. You invest these unnamed "gurus" with credibility. But
you
> > don't name them or site their writings with footnotes.
> >
> > Perhaps these "gurus" are in possession of an enormous amount of
> > personal charisma? Perhaps they are very attractive men? Maybe
their
> > alleged success has nothing at all to do with how much they pay or
> > don't pay, but with some other quality that makes them interesting
an
> > attractive? Have you ever considered the obvious? The obvious being
-
> > what works for them might not work for you?
> >
> > Kate C.
> >



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 4/4/05 1:01:02 PM ---