Andre Lieven wrote:
> "bluesmama" (onebluesmama{at}gmail.com) writes:
> > Viking wrote:
> >> On 3 Apr 2005 19:13:55 GMT, dg411{at}FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Andre
Lieven)
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> A male is not a man,
> >> >
> >> >A male cat is a male, a male human is a *man*.
> >>
> >> Andre's got it right.
> >
> > No, he doesn't.
>
> Well, considering that you're a man hater, we just consider the
> source of your cow shit. So, you're wrong... again.
>
> > I asked what differentiated a male from a man; was it something
extra?
>
> Yes, you idiot: HUMANITY ! Duh !!
>
> > Because in your post, you implied a distinction between Hyerdahl's
> > "men" guests and your own description of a
"man", calling them
"males"
> > but not "men".
>
> Then, you should have...*left that part it*, eh, oh illiterate
dipshit ?
>
> > I'm just asking what that distinction is, and would like to hear
your
> > thoughts on it, if you are inclined to take the question as
seriously
> > as it was intended. Obviously, they weren't male cats, unless
"pussy"
> > was your intended, or unintended, implication.
>
> That some MS-use the term " males " as a " denigration
alone " deal
> in no way invalidates my point. That *you* tried to, only shows your
> hate of *men*.
>
> Andre
>
>
>
> --
> " I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. "
>                                     The Man Prayer, Red Green.

Please come back when you have something substantive to add to the
discussion.



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 4/4/05 1:01:02 PM ---