From: "Robert Comer" 

>It does goes to what's newsworthy though.

You, or any other single entity that tries to decide that is censorship.

>On a more disturbing level it goes to what "they" think is newsworthy.

It doesn't bother me at all, if I start reading something like that I just
stop and move on to something else more interesting.

>And on yet another level, it shows why they're losing readership, people
>read the drivel that "they" determine is important and wonder why they
>subscribe when the next renewal comes up.

That's their problem, not yours. 

--
Bob Comer


"Mark"  wrote in message
news:4387c916{at}w3.nls.net...
> Nor I Bob, nor I. It does goes to what's newsworthy though. On a more
> disturbing level it goes to what "they" think is newsworthy.
And on yet
> another level, it shows why they're losing readership, people read the
> drivel that "they" determine is important and wonder why
they subscribe
> when the next renewal comes up.
>
> "Robert Comer"  wrote in message
> news:4387c7a7$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>> Yes, the relatives should be pissed, as should Ramsey Clark's kin. A
>>> bigger question than the lefts using them is: shouldn't we all be pissed
>>> at the media for covering these types at all? Are they really
>>> meritorious of even a mention on page B28, let alone a headline?
>>
>> I'm not for censorship...
>>
>> --
>> Bob Comer
>>
>>
>> "Mark"  wrote in message
>> news:4387c39b$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>
>>> "Rich Gauszka"  wrote in message
>>> news:4387c198{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>> Good grief Gary the man was a Defense Minister in 1963.
Ronald Reagan
>>>> was a mediocre actor back then and in his last years
didn't even know
>>>> if he was a tree. At least this guy still has an
imagination left. Now
>>>> if I were one of his relatives I'd be pissed at the fringe
groups that
>>>> are using him for publicity.
>>>
>>> Yes, the relatives should be pissed, as should Ramsey Clark's kin. A
>>> bigger question than the lefts using them is: shouldn't we all be pissed
>>> at the media for covering these types at all? Are they really
>>> meritorious of even a mention on page B28, let alone a headline?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5