From: Adam <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near
the bridge">

Richard B. wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 15:59:36 +0100, Ad
>  wrote:
>
>> You could not win a conventional war with Iran without a massive
>> draft, an emptying of the treasury & a loss of position wrt the other
>> great powers e.g. China.
>
> Sure we can, with or without nukes but no crying from the political
> sidelines.

It is a large country (in both area & population (70million)).

You would be able to but only with a large draft, an emptying of the
treasury & strikes against US targets. If you destroyed their nuke
power plant it would not surprise me to see them at the least damage one of
yours.

> You may indeed be right if the Democrats here prefer to
> side with the enemy again in which case the initial premise has been
> invalidated.
>

Rubbish. If you want to side with those who plan human sacrifice &
butchery on a massive scale then why not instead simply get young US people
on to a nice big pyramid & cut their hearts out as an offering to what
ever God you might worship. Much quicker & cheaper.


> Our troops are the best ever and no one can take them down face to
> face unless the politicos hamstring them.  See Lyndon Johnson (D) for
> the playbook here.
>

Yeah & the Germans wouldn't have lost WW1 were it not for the backstabbing Jews.

I am not saying you'd lose. I am saying that winning would be a Pyrrhic
victory in every sense.

You'd basically have one "front" from Syria to Pakistan. How many
US soldiers would you see being raised simply to provide boots on the
ground in the area in sufficient quantities to "win"?

Would you sign up?


Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5