From: "Mark" 

I had a pair of Rectilinear III LowBoys (well my ex still does!) and added
a pair of KLH5s and that Dynaco Quadaptor unit -- surround sound before
their was surround sound  and it worked pretty well. When we went
our separate ways she was much more into music than I and it was just
easier to leave the stuff and less lifting at that. 

"Rich Gauszka"  wrote in
message news:46102181$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> Dynaco - brings back some memories - In my younger days I  once had the
> Dynaco 400 with the optional big blue VU meter kit connected to a pair of
> AR-LST speakers. Although when I tried to get the meters to move the
> tenants below me weren't happy
>
>
>  "Mark"  wrote in message
> news:46101df3$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> Well, you do make a good point, as my ex has my Dynaco Stereo 120 circa
>> 1973 or so and the Hafler pre-amp that I replaced the PAT4 with some
>> years later (not because the PAT4 died, just liked the new one). My Dad
>> had a Harmon-Kardon receiver from the early 60s up till not too long ago,
>> but between tubes being harder to get and the size, he upgraded to
>> something more modern and compact.
>>
>> Still, this Sony receiver wasn't expensive in the first place, maybe $200
>> if that and with a shop charge of at least $35, probably $50, if
>> something else goes shortly thereafter it's just not really cost
>> effective.
>>
>> "Jim Adams"  wrote in message
>> news:460ffd06$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>> I don't think it's worth it on a 10 year old receiver
>>>
>>> Only ten years old?  I have a Pioneer receiver my sister bought in Korea
>>> when she was a lowly Lieutenant (she retired as a Major General).
>>>
>>> In two years it will be 40 years old.  Except for the Tuning Indicator,
>>> which gave up the ghost about 15 years ago, it works fine.
>>> --
>>> Jim Adams
>>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5