-> On 29 May 09  10:32:48, Richard Webb got back to Dan Ceppa 
-> Re: Using What Works
 
 RW> DItto.  AFter reading LIfton and a few others I've got more
 RW> questions than answers on that one .  LIfton's the one
 RW> comes to mind at the moment as I ingest first cup of coffee
 DC>  .
 
 DC> I think many of the questions were answered.  But, there are still 
 DC> some nagging points that need to be addressed. 

 RW> Agreed, and some of them fairly major.  NO matter how they
 RW> try to argue it you can't fire a Carcano as they allege.
 RW> Tain't physically possible.  IT's a bolt action iirc.  No
 RW> physical way that many shots could be fired in that period
 RW> of time by one lone shooter.

That one is easily explained.  Don't forget, there is already a 
round in the chamber as the first shot is fired.  The time frame 
is really for 2 shots.  That can be done.  

My question is the direction that the last shot came from.  I have 
a hard time believing that it did not come from the front.  Autopsy 
reports, photos and x-rays may clear that up.  But, I think the 
forensics were far too rushed in what is easily considered The Murder 
of the Century.  As I understand it, the top of Kennedy's skull 
turned up missing.  

If it was a conspiracy, its size was small for it to have remained 
silent for all these years.  Or, inticate enough that those directly 
involved were killed in a deeper web!  After all, Oswald was offed 
on national TV.  He might have been the one to have at least the 
threads to pull on to unravel a conspiracy.  

But, as has been pointed out, a lone, insignificant killer against 
a beloved President doesn't balance out.  Having a major conspiracy 
were there isn't one makes the act more easily to handle.  


--- OMX/Blue Wave/DOS v2.30