Hi Maurice,

On 2020-11-13 22:50:32, you wrote to me:

 MK> @TZUTC: 0000
 MK> @RFC-3339: 2020-11-13 22:50:32+0000

 WvV>> But that's not the TZUTC flag. ;)

 MK> I forgot to turn them both on in the last reply.  Let me know if it
 MK> actually makes a difference.  Also I took the liberty of dropping the ':'
 MK> character between hours and minutes in the TZ part of the RFC-3339 flag
 MK> which now perfectly matches the digits in the TZUTC flag.  It makes no
 MK> difference to it's enhanced usage over the both the MSG header datetime
 MK> stamp with the TZUTC and vastly eliminates much code in order to make
TZUTC
 MK> useful.

It's in UTC on this message, the next one is ok though...

Bye, Wilfred.

--- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815