Hello Paul,
 In a message dated 27 Jun 96 you wrote to andrew clarke :

 PE> No, that is an incorrect translation.  What you want is

 PE> (raw[3] << 24) | (raw[2] << 16) | (raw[1] << 8) | raw[0].

 PE> I don't know whether it will be faster or not though!  BFN.  Paul. 

Should be a bit faster, since it doesn't shift as often.  I don't think
you'll notice any difference unless it is called a million times a second.

Josh Marshall                        FidoNet   3:640/201.14
Member TEAM AMIGA                    AmigaNet 41:400/869.14

--- Mail Manager 1.2x/p #1219