From: John Cuccia 

I'm not saying it, the National Review is.   Do you believe them?   Do
you find them more or less credible than Fox News?

And unlike the Bush family,  I'm not enamored of the Saudis, though  I find
it perfectly plausible that petroleum plutocrats pull the levers at Fox
News.

On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 18:44:19 -0500, "Mark"  wrote:

>So what you're saying John, is some Saudi Prince "says" he
called Rupert and
>got the ticker-tape changed and you swallow it hook, line and sinker? Since
>when are you so enamored of the Saudis?
>
>"John Cuccia"  wrote in message
>news:538cp1hpp3h8oav7rj8qocret2m2d23gi2{at}4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 20:47:28 +0000, Adam
>> <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near
the bridge"> wrote:
>>
>>>John Cuccia wrote:
>>>> Can Fox News' be any less credible?
>>>>
>>>> http://corner.nationalreview.com/05_12_04_corner-archive.asp#083978
>>>> Our friends at Freedom House's Center for Religious Freedom note:
>>>>
>>>> "Saudi Prince Walid bin Talal made these remarks
during the Arab and
>>>> World Media Conference in Dubai (today and tomorrow) where he was a
>>>> speaker, and the quote was picked up and published by Middle East
>>>> Online. The Prince was remarking on his own influence over what gets
>>>> aired on Murdoch's Fox News Channel now that he (the Prince) is a
>>>> voting shareholder etc.:
>>>>
>>>> "During last month's street protests in France, Fox
ran a banner
>>>> saying: 'Muslim riots'. I picked up the phone and called Murdoch to
>>>> tell him these are not Muslim riots, these are riots out of
>>>> poverty...Within 30 minutes, the title was changed from Muslim riots
>>>> to civil riots."
>>>
>>>The wonders of being lead by Rupie M.
>>
>> Shills for Rupie and his rich friends.  Here's a link that works:
>>
>> http://corner.nationalreview.com/05_12_04_corner-archive.asp#084044
>>>Adam
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5