Hello Michiel,
On Sat Dec 16 2017 16:16:58, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Kees van Eeten:
MV> You come to the right conclusion with the wrong logic. The level
MV> parameter is one of those things that looked like a good idea at the
MV> time but that with the knowledge of today could have been done
MV> without. FTS-5003 recommends to ignore the level parameter on incoming
MV> and only use the name of the identifier for processing. For backward
MV> compatibility the level parameter should still be written on outgoing
MV> messages. For the time being...
Probably forever now. The most used softwares these days are not going to
remove the level parameter, even though they should.
MV> It may disappear one day. Or not...
Most likely not.
Regards,
Nick
... "Не знаю. Я здесь только работаю."
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20170303
* Origin: thePharcyde_ distribution system (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)
|