| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: ATM Progress on 9` and 10` x 5/8` mirrors |
From: "Richard F.L.R. Snashall"
To: atmlist
Reply-To: "Richard F.L.R. Snashall"
Bob May wrote:
> Not explictly only TOT but some guys have ended up with a fair bit of their
> work that way after going too far with the initial grinding.
> I've got to do a thin mirror one of these days so that I can see what the
> problems are. Righ now, I've got a 6" refractor that I'm going to build as
> a finder scope for my 200" refractor. The glass is from Jan Sugaski's
> little sale of 6" and 4" refractor glass and I'm going to do
a F8 with the
> following curves:
> R1 = 29.64":
> T1 = .590"
> R2 = 19.21"
> T2 = .040:
> R3 = 19.22"
> T3 = .512:
> R4 = 61.34"
> RoweTrace tends to indicate that this is a good set of numbers for the BSC2
> and SF12 glasses. Anybody got better numbers for this? I'll note that the
> results tend to indicate to me that there may be a need to parabolize a
> surface to reduce spherical aberration.
If the last three radii are negative, I get lambda/20 RMS at 509.4 nm and
lambda/90 RMS at 597.4 nm (using BK7 in lieu of BSC2, though). How much
parabolization would you want?
Rick S.
--- BBBS/NT v4.00 MP
* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/1.100)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.