From: "Mark" 

"...but if anyone gets the slightest bit greedy (and they will, it's
human nature), it's a recipe for revolution."

Fine then. I prefer revolution to submission. Let's keep that revolution
roiling permanently and prevent anyone, anywhere, anytime from getting
ahead, because if everyone can't have a chalet in the Alps, then no one
should, unless they work for the equality police at the United Nations


"Robert Comer"  wrote in
message news:3bqb739162o79eo0fbqccktguo2fp22lq2{at}4ax.com...
>I don't buy into that theory either.
>
> I haven't seen a political/economic system yet that is both fair and
> workable for all, they all have their drawbacks.  Yours really does
> create an elite economic class that runs things behind the scenes.
> There's no hope of getting a better lot in life for 99% of the people.
> True communism is basically LCD'ing everyone, so there's no hope of
> getting a better lot in life for anyone.
>
> btw, supply side economics will fail in the long run because the
> masses will eventually not be able to buy the needed goods -- its a
> quick fix to boost an economy, but if anyone gets the slightest bit
> greedy (and they will, it's human nature), it's a recipe for
> revolution.
>
> --
> Bob Comer
>
>
>
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 19:43:34 -0400, Gary Britt
>  wrote:
>
>>Nah, Marx said it better and more persuasively.
>>
>>Gary
>>
>>Robert Comer wrote:
>>>> Your build wealth by standing on the backs of the workers
is the same
>>>> bullshit we've tried for years, it works for the few and the rest
>>>> suffer.
>>>> This is not a solution for a country, it's a recipe for creating the
>>>> elite.
>>>
>>> Well said.
>>>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5