From: Adam <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near
the bridge">

Geo. wrote:
> "George Sherwood"  wrote in message
> news:46741db5$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>
>> The term may not of existed, but it is clear that the idea has existed
>> for a long time.  Not sure I see your point.  No matter what you call
>> it, it is covered in the GC.
>
> Ok good we agree that term is an invention of this administration, thats
> a start.
>
> Can you find a URL where it shows the part of the GC that covers
> fighters who don't qualify as POW's? Basically all I can find is that it
> says here are the rules for war when both sides play by the rules but it
> doesn't define anything for when both sides don't play by the rules. It
> just defines the rules to determine if it applies.
>
> Geo.

Nah it's mostly covered via nuremburg after the various precedents set due
to SS "anti-partisan actions".

Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5