From: Gary Britt 

No, your assertion remains factually incorrect and therefore GIGO applies
to your entire argument below.

Gary

Ad wrote:
> Gary Britt wrote:
>> Your assertion is factually incorrect so conclusions drawn therefrom
>> are also incorrect.
>>
>
> Rubbish
>
> In such ab event the main thing is to secure your base.
>
> In order to achieve that they targeted those civilians which were not
> with them.
>
> No different to the Russian revolution & the Bolsheviks or indeed any
> insurgent attempted takeover. No different from the Iraqi insurgents
> targeting iraqi civies.
>
> To quote a tory:
>
> "If I must be enslaved let it be by a King at least, and not by a parcel
> of upstart lawless Committeemen. If I must be devoured, let me be
> devoured by the jaws of a lion, and not gnawed to death by rats and
> vermin.""
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loyalist_(American_Revolution)
>
> In an odd echo of now...
>
> "In October 1775, Congress passed a resolution calling for the arrest of
> all loyalists who are dangerous to "the liberties of America.""
>
>
> Adam
>> Gary
>>
>> Adam > wrote:
>>> Gary Britt wrote:
>>>> They were part of an organization that regularly targets
CIVILIANS so
>>>> they are terrorists even if that particular act was
against a Military
>>>> target. They are also terrorists because they aren't part of the
>>>> regular
>>>> army of any recognized government and they are not engaged in an
>>>> internal civil war.
>>>>
>>>
>>> So that definitely makes Washington et al terrorists given the loyalist
>>> civilians were a major focus of their effort.
>>>
>>> Adam
>>>
>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>> John Cuccia wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:28:10 -0400, Gary Britt
>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Terrorists attack CIVILIAN NON-MILITARY TARGETS.
>>>>> So the people who blew up the USS Cole were not terrorists?

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5