On Sat 2039-Mar-19 01:22, Mvan Le (3:800/432) wrote to Richard Webb:

 RW>   I thought he was doing this in his maximus events
 RW> instead of binkley.  I was and am wondering why if he's
 RW> running binkley in front of max for his dial-up node.  I'd
 RW> run this from bink.
 RW> I've never done anything with maximus events in the years
 RW> I've run it because events were always defined in
 RW> binkley.evt and once I figured it out the only thing I had
 RW> to do with max was one event that disallowed yell for chat
 RW> with sysop.

ML> It is cooler to use both Binkley events and Maximus events.

ML> Binkley events should relate to mailer stuff. Nightly BBS
ML> maintenance go in the Maximus file. That way, a BBS computer can
ML> appear to be doing more important things than it actually is.

Iirc a friend of mine running multinode bink/max did
something like that for maint of some games and other bbs
stuff.  One node iirc was mailer the other node a wfc
maximus only.  During mail periods he'd have the wfc only
node doing some bbs maintenance tasks.  Horses for courses I guess
.  I think iirc he still did msg base maint etc. from the
binkley node's events.


HOwever, it's been a few years since I recall having
anything to do with his setup, although I did help him make
the switch to bink/max initially and ad doing the co-sysop
thing from remote for him for awhil after that.

Regards,
           Richard
--- timEd 1.10.y2k+