TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: atm
to: ATM
from: georgea{at}cam.org
date: 2003-05-02 23:23:06
subject: ATM Questions about Schmidt formulas in R&V

From: George Anderson 
To: atm 
Reply-To: George Anderson 


While trying to improve the mediocre performance of my corrector design I
started wondering about my interpretation of some of the formulas in
R&V Telescope Optics.
On page 301 and 302 I have been trying to decide if there are
inconsistencies in the typsetting.
Formula 21.11.2 uses a multiply point sign between hp and the sqrt sign
with no root number in the sign (normal from what I remember from college).
Yet 21.11.4 has a 2 beside the sqrt sign with no multiply point. Are they
saying multiply the sqrt by 2 or are they just emphasizing that it is root
2?
Same thing with 21.11.6 on pg 302, is it r times the sqrt or is it the r root of...?
the results of A B and C seem to be out by  a few orders of magnitude when
I use Oslo to design the schmidt camera. Also, do A B and C relate directly
to the 4th, 6th, and 8th order deformations?

George Anderson
Montreal Canada

Clear skies and good health

--- BBBS/NT v4.00 MP
* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/1.100)
SEEN-BY: 633/267 270
@PATH: 379/1 106/1 2000 633/267

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.