> And that really puzzles me. From what most users report, compressed
 > SLIP and PPP seem to be THE standard. So why in the world did the
 > authors of STiK choose to only support uncompressed SLIP? Was it not
 > possible to implement compressed SLIP or PPP? 
 
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
 
Well, compression requires extra programming, and extra time.  Only a few
MONTHS ago, the 'standard' was SLIP.  Now, things are moving so fast on the
Internet that PPP has replaced it as the protocol of choice for most Internet
providers.  It's a real bear to keep up...
Ron

--- FIDOdoor+ 3.2.6

[+/84 of 200/108 Mins] = * FIDO: ST_PROG =: Next...