| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Moderators? |
10 Mar 08 00:14, Richard Webb wrote to Roy Witt:
RW>> AS you said before, they would be able to produce mail, but not
RW>> route it. This is why we have session and packet passwording.
>> They can crash it. Someone has already shown how a netmail packet
>> can be dropped on any system that might be in a route and the
>> netmail will be sent to the system intended. No session or packet
>> password required.
RW> Depends on how your mail processing works. Iow how you've got it
RW> configured. Squish for example can be set up rather strictly in this
RW> regard, especially when coupled with binkleyterm.
That's true. However, one only needs to find on link in the route that
isn't so configured.
R\%/itt
--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000
* Origin: SATX Alamo Area Net * South * Texas, USA * (1:397/22)SEEN-BY: 10/1 3 14/300 34/999 53/558 90/1 116/901 120/228 123/500 134/10 140/1 SEEN-BY: 222/2 226/0 236/150 249/303 261/20 38 100 1381 1404 1406 1418 SEEN-BY: 280/1027 320/119 396/45 633/104 260 262 267 285 712/848 800/432 SEEN-BY: 801/161 189 2222/700 2320/100 2905/0 @PATH: 397/22 123/500 261/38 633/260 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.