Why couldn't we do it similiar to the following?  Thoughts?


  
    
    
  


or


  


Thanks!
Chris

 wrote in message news:1041272567.716.0{at}tkdsoftware.com...
> > I will move up to Net, Region, Zone, complete nodelist later...
>
node/node>
>
> > Which attributes should we have for node? Here are some thoughts. Should
> any
> > of these be a child to node?
>
> > number=
>
> > status=
> > keywords from current nodelist and add ION for Internet Only Node.
Others?
>
> > Location=
>
> > Sysop=
>
> > phone=
>
> > root-domain=
>
> > speed=
>
> > flags=
>
> > In my first attempt at XML nodelist I had most of these as a child
http://harborwebs.com:8080/Net379/v0.0.5.NET379.XML
>
> > points should be a child to node, I believe. Points should have similar
> if
> > not the same attributes /children as a node.
>
> > With best regards, Dale Ross.  E-mail:
Dale.Ross{at}p1.f1.n379.z1.fidonet.org
>
>      Hmm...  how about ION connection type?  That is, which piece of
> information  to pay attention to....  Is the ION a Static IP -- i.e. the
QUAD
> number never changes and can be listed by number?  Or, is the ION a
Dynamic
> IP -- i.e. the DNS name never changes, but rather points to an ever
changing
> dynamic QUAD number pool.  (For example, my router just went down and none
> of my new name servers know of HarborWebs.  I had to Telnet in via Quad
Number
> or I wouldn't get in at all!)
>
> --- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4
http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/1.45)
> PATH: 379/1



--- Mail-ennium/32 v1.01.301.9/#01-0001