From: "Scott Berfield" 
To: "Amul Munshi" , 
Reply-To: "Scott Berfield" 


When I ran this through FigureXP (and I am far from an expert!) I get:

PV Wavefront error 1/15.28
Strehl Ratio: .985

As I say, I probably did it wrong, but if this is accurate I would stop now
and stick it in a scope.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-atm{at}shore.net [mailto:owner-atm{at}shore.net] On Behalf Of Amul
Munshi
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 8:16 PM To: atm{at}shore.net
Subject: RE: ATM First Foucault Readings


Hi Everyone

Sorry I forgot to post the zone radii

Inner Radius of zone 1 : 0.75  (to mask the central hole) Outer Radius of
Zone 1 : 2.0730 Outer Radius of Zone 2 : 2.8340 Outer Radius of Zone 3 :
3.4310 Outer Radius of Zone 4 : 3.9380

Source if fixed


Thanks

Aditya Munshi

-----Original Message-----
From: scottythefiddler [mailto:scottythefiddler{at}cogeco.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:12 AM To: Aditya Munshi
Subject: Re: ATM First Foucault Readings

In order to interpret the readings, we need to know what the zonal radii
are, and whether you have a fixed source or moving source tester.

sd
----- Original Message -----
From: "Aditya Munshi" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 1:03 PM Subject: ATM First Foucault Readings


>
> Hi Everyone
>
> After my first parabolizing session, I did a set of zonal measurements
> (inches):
>
> 0.000    0.064 0.08    0.106
> 0.000    0.046 0.07    0.101
> 0.000    0.051 0.07    0.106
> 0.000    0.048 0.063    0.102
>
> Clear Aper: 7.875 inch
> ROC : 111.25 inch
> Secondary 1.5inch diameter
>
>
>
> On interpreting the data in TEX, and  Foucault Test Analyzer. The
result
> seems to be quite acceptable. Could someone please put the readings in
> yourself so I can be sure there has been no mistake by me.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> BTW I'm not so sure about the readings on the edge zone, will take new
> readings again tomorrow and post again
>
>
> Aditya Munshi
>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4