To: atm{at}shore.net
From: Jim Burrows 
Reply-To: Jim Burrows 


At 20:19 2003-07-22 +0530, Aditya Munshi wrote:

>The overall figure shows a 1/5 wave PV and 0.93 Strehl according to
>figure XP.(this time I am sure the readings are accurate :) ). But
>putting the same data into Foucault test analysis which works on the
>maths of Jim Burrows shows a 1/3.9 PV and 1/17.5 RMS Surface.
>
>Don't know what causes the discrepancy; from what I've heard I feel
>figxp should be trusted more.

Post the readings together with inner and outer zone radii (and, of course,
fixed or moving source).  Maybe we can figure out what is going on.

         -- Jim Burrows
         -- mailto://burrjaw{at}earthlink.net
         -- http://home.earthlink.net/~burrjaw
         -- Seattle N47.4723 W122.3662 (WGS84)

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5