On Jan 11 21:05, 1997, Hamish Moffatt of 3:632/552 wrote:

Hi Hamish,

 >> I don't have any harddrive thrashing like you say you'r getting, and 
 >> I find that win95 and warp4 four perform about the same, but warp4 is 
 >> just a little bit faster/snapier than puke95...

 HM> Obviously I need some optimisations, then. Is this CONFIG.SYS 
 HM> information and optimisation program still around and current?

Unless the progran say's it's for warp4, then don't run it.. All i've done
(now on my second machine as well. It's a 586-100/32mram) is up the
cache/swap file and remove a couple of things (one being the second floppy
basedev driver), other wise my config.sys file is non-sorted...

BTW: my swap file on this machine (the bbs system) is sitting at 8mb and
the system has been up for 2day's 15 hours... It's had a lot of use in that
time, and I had the swap file start at 6mb.

BTW2: are you running the warp4 system on fat or hpfs file system's? The
system's here are: BBS - HPFS all the way. My machine - HPFS and Fat (os/2
and the main system is hpfs, the dos V5/games drive is fat...)




Stephen

--- Msged/2 4.00