| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Latest Courier SDLs |
HM>>>> THAT's a fairly generous statement on USR's part. From HM>>>> memory, they fixed the bug where Rockwell couldn't HM>>>> connected at 33600 (or 3429 symbol rate, specifically) to HM>>>> USR; there was never any sign that this wasn't USR's fault, HM>>>> and since Rockwell to Rockwell worked fine, it might as HM>>>> well have been USR's fault .. :-) DD>>> If enough modems make the same error, does that make the DD>>> error a standard? Remember the Netcomm modems of a few years DD>>> back? Had no problems with other Netcomms.... HM>> Yes, but there are more Rockwell modems than NetComms -- and HM>> more than USRs even. DD>>Still doesn't make it the documented standard. LD> Umm.. your not going to give in on this one are you? LD> There was a message from a Supra tech to a USR tech about a LD> year ago which described the problem. Their opinion was that LD> USR must have had a different interpretation of the V.34 LD> specs by choosing 3200 instead of the 3429 symbol rate when LD> presented with the particular set of values in the INFO LD> sequences. LD> There was a rumor going around that USR was protecting LD> against the early Rockwell V.34 chip revision which had LD> problems at the 3429 symbol rate. LD> Supra and others changed their firmware to work with USR LD> modems, USR then changed their firmware to work with the rest LD> of the Rockwells. LD> I'm not sure if Rockwell themselves have made any changes to LD> their stock code. LD> Everyone can now interoperate except unmodified Rockwells LD> calling Austel Couriers, as they still use the old USR LD> firmware. LD> I would have to agree with Hamish on this, if it is a problem LD> with the interpretation of the standard then given the state LD> of the modem world it should be up to USR to fix it. Not SO!!!! I have 5 USR Couriers and a USR Sportster and recently bought a Rockwell Voice/Fax/Modem/Speakerphone Now the story is that I can call any USR modem successfully with the Rockwell BUT I CANT CALL ANY BLOODY ROCKWELL MODEMS AT ALL. This Rockwell WILL not negotiate with another Rockwell at all (just sits there sqealing) and yet it negotiated with ANY USR that I have called and connects imediately. ---* Origin: Electron Migration (3:640/305.55) SEEN-BY: 50/99 54/99 620/243 623/630 625/155 640/201 206 230 305 306 311 702 SEEN-BY: 640/820 821 822 823 829 711/401 413 430 934 712/623 624 841 713/317 SEEN-BY: 714/906 772/20 800/1 @PATH: 640/305 820 712/624 711/934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.