| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: ATM Kennedy Optics vs Galaxy Optics |
From: "John Sherman" To: Reply-To: "John Sherman" Hi All, >Is this map showing the wavefront? >www.johnspics.com/hi/hudek.jpg Yes. Divide by two for surface error. > Is a turned down edge visible? No. The Interferometer only reaches out to about the 97% zone. The image shows a drastic rolled off edge area, also known as a TDEZ (turned down edge zone). This would be the outermost zones, 80 - 95%, and by inference you can imagine that the extreme edge is also turned down. I automatically blacked out the very edge, the imagined TDE, before putting it in the scope. And I still had no rings inside focus. >The shame about this mirror ( in its original form ) is that most of the >error is just pure overcorrection ....1.6 waves in fact, An assessment agreed upon by almost everyone. >Another 30 minutes polishing down the 70% zone would have produced >a much finer result You might think that when he refigured the mirror that that's what he'd've done. Yet the second incarnation included a large, 8" diameter hill in the center, surrounded by a deep trough, and the TDEZ remained. The P-V error remained about the same. It seemed that he just moved the errors around without curing them. Because I still had no rings inside focus. Stopping the mirror down to 20" reduced the spikes, and a faint set of rings began to be visible through the fuzzball. And the images were a bit sharper, but still poor. He said that is one of the best mirrors he ever made, and I suppose I believe him.... John --- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/100) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/100 1 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.