->But his ratings come
->becuase of hype from the companies that have him as a sponser, it's
->just like  when Andre Agersie was with tennis when he first
->started. Will people follow  Tiger's career for a short time untill
->the newness wears off?
It wasn't Agassi's "newness" that wore off.. he stopped winning so much, and
advertisers decided to stay away instead of knocking on his door with ads.
The same goes for Woods.  If he had missed the cut after the first round of
his first few tournaments, sponsers would be staying away in droves.
Bottom line:  Being unique helps, but winning is what it's all about
-*- TurboEDIT v1.60a+ [MSP96]
--- Ezycom V1.48g0 01fa0167
---------------