Path:
eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september
.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-septemb
er.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: no hope or change 
Newsgroups: misc.survivalism,az.politics,mn.politics,fl.politics,dfw.politics
Subject: Re: And this clown wants to be president.
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 18:00:34 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 75
Message-ID: 
References: 

 


 

Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 00:00:26 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="b978618259244a668fbf24a84785c463";
 logging-data="24811";
mail-complaints-to="abuse{at}eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+qdQXbcfiUkWbnsSgNXtVlGLg2pAqc/p8="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.7) Gecko/20120824
Thunderbird/10.0.7
In-Reply-To: 
Cancel-Lock: sha1:mSdUQs+tEcdsmPyCG9mDlkeqCY0=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org misc.survivalism:22514 az.politics:2458
mn.politics:62 fl.politics:61 dfw.politics:259

On 9/15/2012 5:01 PM, ? wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2012 22:38:34 -0600, no hope or change
> wrote:
>
>> On 9/14/2012 9:34 PM, ? wrote:
>>> He clipped out
>>
>> Get this though your sick diseased old diabetic brain, you will NEVER
>> outlast me, never.
>>
> Outlast you at what?

These witless displays of political impotence of yours, the ones where 
you always mung the followups to a dead group, like the coward you are.

> At least I have a brain.

"Had"...perhaps...

> The only sick person
> here is you.  Did you happen to have sex with a monkey?  Get HIV?
> You have the ramblings of an addict.  What are you on?

This is the other thing about you that is useless, your total inability 
to talk any effective smack.

In essence you're stunted, almost childish in your ability to cross 
swords here.

I pity you that.

> The Republican party isn't what it used to be. Our leaders and

Blah, blah, blah...

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/time_for_democrats_for_romn
ey_AUZ6cjhzmQwugmwm4pEt6J

Almost all of my friends are Democrats; all of them voted for Barack 
Obama in 2008.

Ask them these days, as I have, if they plan to vote for Obama this 
November, and they’ll give you an “Oh shucks” sad smile, look down, look 
back up with guilty eyes and say “I’m disappointed.”

Then they play the party line and say. “But Romney? But Ryan?”

I’m not talking about those African Americans, Latinos and lockstep 
Democrats who’ll blindly vote for Obama no matter how high unemployment 
may be or what shape this country may be in.

I’m talking about a good number of intelligent, caring, middle-class 
Democrats who are a soft nudge away from casting their vote for Romney.

All they need to know is that they’re not alone.

Democrats were disappointed in 1980. They’d had, under President Jimmy 
Carter, four years of inflation, unemployment and gas rationing. Yet, 
when asked, they said, “But Reagan?”

At this point in 1980, Carter was nine points ahead of Ronald Reagan in 
the polls. Reagan had been slimed by the press and pro-Jimmy Carter 
forces as being dumb and bumbling. Sound familiar?

Carter treated Reagan as a ridiculous figure who, among other things, 
was ignorant of details of nuclear-weapons policy. Reagan cheerfully 
promised economic growth and asked Democrats, “Are you better off than 
you were four years ago?”

In the end, Reagan proved that good-natured conservatism could win by 
huge margins. But a lot of credit for the win must go to “Democrats for 
Reagan.”


https://www.facebook.com/DemocratsForMittRomney
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.1