Gronk!

In a msg of ,Spamthis!mostlyharmless{at}jksrv.Com wrote:

 >> Regarding those "adult" themes...   Like is it time
once again to get a
 >> consensus on whether a clean, relatively family-friendly message area
 >> like MooseChat should allow "snugglebunnies" as a
discussion topic?

 Sm> All  moral issues aside, is it not nearly impossible for meese to snuggle
 Sm> with bunnies without squashing them?

I think it depends on the flexibility and overall athletic ability of
the participants, eh?

For some reason, I'm now needing to fight-off nostalgic memories of a
party where some members of a local University Women's Gymnastic Team
put in an appearance.  Anyway, moving on to safer topics...

I've already mentioned the "snugglebunny" versus "snugglybunny"
confusion in another message, but perhaps we need to think back on the
usage of the term "snugglebunny" ?  I think some meese often use
"snugglebunny" as a generic term referring to a Significant Other,
whether long-term or short-term.  For all I know, it may even be a
variation on Hugh Hefner's "Playboy Bunny", and there is usually no
worry about possibly crushing any "bunny" that Hefner hangs out with.

Meanwhile, returning to the morality of talking about snugglebunnies
in MooseChat...

I think we're safe with passing references to violence, such as
conversational threads like "Alternative Antler bashing".  We also
have a long history of allowing political satire which some folks
might almost think was subversive.  The question is whether we should
risk "crossing the line" regarding North American avoidance of
sensuality or sexuality outside of "Restricted" movies, television
shows or discussion forums.

In closing, I'll quickly mention that being new-millennium meese, we
only use terms like "snugglebunny" "snugglybunny" and
"Playboy Bunny"
with utmost respect, sensitivity and caring!

Yours in the Way of the Moose,           ...Steve

-
Who was that masked moose, and why did he leave a silver antler tip?

---