| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Echos? |
I can't press a magical Forward button it would seem, but I'll quote his original message to you that I replied to since you said you didn't get it. > Jeff Smith wrote in a message to All: > JS> I acknowledge Allen's interest in reviving dead echos by > JS> injecting them with activity from the internet. And compliment him > JS> for his efforts to filter the incoming messages from the > JS> newsgroups. But a lingering question in my mind is "Is this the > JS> best answer?". > Ah..what would you propose....say having a set number of echoes a person > could list? Moderators need to get someones permission to list echoes? > The biggest reason folks can collect echotags is that other folks don't > have the interest to keep their listings active. > The last echo-collector of note in Fidonet is no longer active as a > collector....and the tags were/are being recycled. > Hopefully Allen will quickly tire of raising the dead and either let the > listings lapse or simply keep them as place holders. > One could also state that if we don't like folks relisiting echoes, all > we need to do is relist them ourselves...and either make the echoes > active, or preserve the name as place-holders....If we don't do that, > then why complain about something we have so little interest in we can't > be bothered to participate? > JS> From the Echolist I see that 191 echos are controled by 8 > JS> people and 112 echos are controled by just 2 people. This grabbing > JS> of echos has been done by others in the past. > Relisting an expired echo tag is simply relisting something....why use a > negative term like grabbing? > JS> We all can remember > JS> their names and the effect that it had on our hobby. > Exactly what effects did it have, not only in the short run, but in the > long run? > JS> One of the > JS> things that I have liked about this network is it's diversity. With > JS> ideas, opinions, and thoughts coming in from many differant > JS> directions. A hobby where control is not at the direction of a > JS> smaller and smaller group of people. > But Fidonet is shrinking...so there are less and less people in the > universe. > Criticise the folks not taking action....but you'll find a large number > of them simply don't care. > cya, > thom > http://www.tlchost.net/echolist/ > --- GEcho 1.20/Pro --- D'Bridge 2.98> * Origin: Home of The Other Robot (1:261/1352) * Origin: FyBBS (1:229/500) SEEN-BY: 10/1 3 14/300 34/999 53/558 90/1 116/901 120/228 123/500 134/10 140/1 SEEN-BY: 222/2 226/0 236/150 249/303 261/20 38 100 1381 1404 1406 1418 SEEN-BY: 280/1027 320/119 396/45 633/104 260 262 267 285 712/848 800/432 SEEN-BY: 801/161 189 2222/700 2320/100 2905/0 @PATH: 229/500 426 123/500 261/38 633/260 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.