From: Ross and Jane 
@Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 20:47:42 -0600
@Sender: semware-owner{at}sawasdi.apana.org.au



I use version 20 something of NT Emacs on a daily basis.  For most editin=
g
tasks I turn to TSE.  Why? Fast, Fast, Fast.  Emacs has it all (it really=
 does)
but on a WinNT/2000 PC, TSE runs rings around it.  I don't know how TSE w=
ould
compare to Emacs on a Linux/Unix OS, but leaving out the Emacs kitchen si=
nk
might give TSE an edge for many tasks.  I have to admit I do like the Ema=
cs
key-bindings...and TSE didn't seem to mind when I burned a Emacs configur=
ation
file into it to simplify my life.

Ross Barnes

Stein =D8iestad wrote:

>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Kraus" 
> To: 
> > For Unix, then Linux, I wrote an EMACS configuration
> > file that remapped the keyboard for Tse-like
> > functions.  (Quite) A few hours spent reading the
> > EMACS help is time well spent.  VI was OK for
> > little tasks, but EMACS is a really good reason
> > why Sammy should NOT try to implement Tse
> > under Linux.
> I think there are many good reasons to see a TSE/Linux version, and I d=
on't
> agree on this!
>
> -stein
>
> --
> TSEPro mailing list

--
TSEPro Mailing List
List Maintenance: www.semware.com/html/list.htm



---
[sawasdi.apana.org.au] (3:800/846.13)