| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | bullet weight tradeoffs |
VERN HUMPHREY wrote in a message to ROY J. TELLASON: RJT>VH> You can also get computer programs, like Ballistic Explorer, which RJT>VH> have libraries of data on commercially available ammo. RJT>Not familiar with that one, maybe I oughta check it out. Is it RJT>commercial shareware, freeware, or what? VH> Commercial, sold by Oheler -- you might find it on the net, if you VH> look. Yeah, I might, if I had 'net access other than email... :-) RJT>VH> A heavier bullet may penetrate much deeper, and hang together RJT>VH> better. On the other hand, it may not expand very much, if any. RJT>No? I would have thought that slower-moving would've meant that RJT>the expansion would be more likely to work better. VH> It depends -- IF it is moving fast enough to expand, a slow, heavy VH> bullet will both expand and penetrate. Slow it down, and it will VH> just penetrate. Speed it up, and it may disintegrate on impact, VH> leaving a gory wound, but not immediately incapacitating. RJT>VH> I think the consensus is the 147 JHP is a bit too much for the RJT>VH> 9mmX19. RJT>Too much? You mean I *should* consider a lighter load? VH> Most experience is that a 115 to 125 grain bullet will be better in VH> 9mm. The heavier bullet doesn't have the expansion. Hmm. RJT>I've otherwise just shot at typical paper targets, and have been RJT>thinking "silhouette" might be something I could get into, if I RJT>could find a club in the area that's got those sorts of targets. I RJT>also have at hand here a small stack of those little aluminum pie RJT>plates, the ones that are maybe 4 inches across? Seems to me it'd RJT>be pretty easy to get a push pin through those, maybe use them as RJT>targets too. Probably better than paper, anyhow. We'll how it RJT>goes once I feel like I won't roast when going out there. VH> Plates, aluminium and paper make good targets. We've now gone from just the hot-n-humid to lots of rain showers. Maybe if I can get out early in the day... VH> Silhouette targets are in two different categories -- "Silhouette VH> Matches" are shot at heavy metal silhouettes of game animals, the VH> rule being you must knock the silhouette down to score." I've seen pictures of those in magazines, that's the ones I'm thinking of. VH> The paper or cardboard "FBI silhouette" and similar shaped targets VH> are usually avaliable from places like Midway, Cheaper than Dirt, VH> and so on. Nah, I have no use for those. If it comes to me having to aim at an actual person, I have no doubts about my ability to double-tap where it's gonna do some good -- center of mass, one or two shots, and if they're still standing, then I aim a little higher. I sometimes wonder about the mindset of people who use those things. One time I was out at a public range (they have those on state game lands here in PA), and there were a couple there -- co-workers, not "a couple" in any other sense, and they had obviously just bought their guns, and were getting ready to try and "qualify" somehow or other. They had those targets, and had to get way up close before they could put several rounds into them. Lots closer than the 25 yards where the benches were set up... Watching those folks was downright scary! Some kinda state workers. ---* Origin: TANSTAAFL BBS 717-838-8539 (1:270/615) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 270/615 150/220 379/1 10/345 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.