On 3/28/2003 9:34 AM, DALE ROSS wrote to CHRIS CRANFORD:

-b/b>
-b/b>
-b1041755313{at}p0.f1200.n379.z1.ftn/b>
->  CC> I may want to see a minor change to the above.  I'm trying to think if
->  CC> it would make better sense to list the flags in the following fashion:
-> 
-flags other="other misc nonvalidated flags" >
-speed/speed>
-online/online>
-modem/modem>
-update/update>
-compression/compression>
-compression/compression>
-others/others>]
-/flags>
-> 
->  CC> This way whatever program is reading the XML nodelist knows to just
->  CC> concatenate all fields that have the same tag names (ie.
->  CC> compression="V32B,V42B")  ... What do you think of that?
-> 
-> hmm... I agree that they should all be children instead of attributes. Is
-> it "ok" to have two children of the same name under the same parent?

  I thought so.  If memory serves me write, most XML parsers give you the 
  ability to generate an array in that case or concatenate the fields using
  a delimiting character.  

Chris 

--- Mail-ennium/32 v1.01.301.11/#01-0001