On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 11:01:43 +0000
"Jason Bock" (1:267/310)  wrote:

> FuNet is an alternative network for use with FidoNet compatible
> software.  We pass messages back and forth both in netmail and in
> echomail conferences.  In FuNet, each node is welcomed and assisted
> in many ways by other FuNet members.  We have active echomail areas
> and a growing file echo selection.  Our echomail traffic is growing
> every day, and are now pulling more mail ever than before.
> 
>         ___________        _______             __   
>         \_   _____/ __ __  \      \    ____  _/  |_ 
>           |    __)  |  |  \ /   |   \ _/ __ \ \   __\
>           |     \   |  |  //    |    \\  ___/  |  |  
>           \___  /   |____/ \____|__  / \___  > |__|  
>               \/                   \/      \/   
>                 Application for Membership
> 
> --- ProBoard v2.31
> (1:267/310)


What makes this network different from every other dead network that
I'm apart of? WHy, as a sysop, would I add it? What do you provide that
is different from Fidonet, or fsxnet or agoranet, or ilink which seem
to be the only active (or most active) nets currently.
-- 
End Of The Line BBS - Plano, TX
telnet endofthelinebbs.com 23
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux