| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Is Linux a tower of babel? |
From: Adam <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near
the bridge">
Randall Parker wrote:
> In my on-going battle to get a Matrox P650 graphics card properly
> configured for dual head portrait I saw this from a guy who tweaked the
> driver to get it to work in Fedora Core 6 and SuSE 10.2:
>
> http://www.tuxx-home.at/archives/2006/12/11/T22_52_32/
> ChangeLog:
>
> * Added support for SuSE 10.2 (another curious Xorg version) in
> install.sh
>
>
> Note he says "another curious Xorg version". So this isn't the first
> time he's run into a variation on how coders have made Xorg produce
> different output or require different arguments for what ought to be
> standard behavior.
>
> How bad is this problem? How much are the distros making things
> different from each other in areas where layouts and behaviors ought to
> be identical?
>
>
Nah it's got the same info but put in a different way by the code which
generated the X-org conf. I have no doubt it's the same on windows but that
on windows, such things are simply kept hidden from you so coz you don't
need to bother your sweet little user head about such things.
There is a simple solution which is to simply write the x conf yourself.
It's not hard & then you can adopt whatever style etc you like.
Adam
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 379/45 1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.