| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Comparing distro update policies |
From: Tim Boyer
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 11:24:18 -0500, "Geo." wrote:
>"Randall Parker"
>
>wrote in message news:4592e2b2{at}w3.nls.net...
>
>> For example, Fedora just dropped support for Fedora Core 4. Fedora Core 5
>> came out in March 2006 and Fedora Core 6 came out in October 2006.
>> Anything you installed before March 2006 isn't going to get fixes for
>> security patches if you were getting them from the Fedora project.
>
>This is one of the problems with software today, it's going to take a
>consumer law to force vendors to provide patches for 10 years like they have
>to provide parts for other consumer devices. That will also help to slow
>down this silly upgrade treadmill so that upgrades are really only for
>significant changes.
>
>Geo.
Yeah, but Fedora is _supposed_ to be bleeding edge. It's the hobbyists'
OS; the one you play around with. It's not supplied by any corporation.
It's what feeds Red Hat Enterprise. RHE _is_ supported by Red Hat, and
they promise version support for seven years. IMHO, seven years for OS
support isn't bad.
--
tim boyer
tim{at}denmantire.com
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 379/45 1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.