-=> Quoting Sean Dennis to John Dailey <=-

 SD> {at}MSGID: 1:11/200 405fc8fb
 SD> Hello, John.

 SD> On 23 Mar 04 at 10:31, John Dailey wrote to Scott Adams:
 
 JD> No, 20 is REALLY LOW.  Trust me.  There's a lot of people out there
 JD> still doing the BBS thing - especially now that everyone's figured out
 JD> telnet is perfect for it.

 SD> It's because Scott refuses to go telnet on his board; I get plenty of
 SD> callers on my board (and I haven't even begun to get it advertised
 SD> yet). 
 SD> I know that the Synchronet BBS list has 193 systems listed and all of
 SD> the boards on there are active. 
 SD> It's foot-dragging into what BBSing is evolving into is what is
 SD> causing some people to see their BBS usage drop to nil. ;) 

        Well progress is one thing.  but if you don't need the progress
        since the activity is there then no need to go telnet. Thus
        my choice.  If I had a board with nil users and nil activity
        I might consider it.


... "Commander. This is a private matter." - Sheridan
--- Fringe BBS