ml>RN> While you make an excellent point, I don't beleive the intention 
ml>RN> of the manufacturer was to place contamination in the 
ml>RN> marketplace.
 RN>  
ml> true but the article needs some work and should not have passed with the
ml> above wording :rolleyes: ;)
 RN>  
 RN> I don't see how the article could have been more plain than it was.
 RN> It seemed straightforward to me.

what i'm trying (and obviously failing) to point out is that that bacteria
stuff doesn *CAUSE DIETING* as that one part of the article stated...
/that/ one part just doesn't work...

)\/(ark