From: "James C. Sewell" 
@Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 20:17:16 -0500
@Sender: semware-owner{at}sawasdi.apana.org.au


I must agree that EMACS is not a good reason to avoid doing a Linux-TSE 
port.  For one thing, I have a pet peeve about programs that try to do 
everything.  A mail program should be a mail program, an editor should be 
an editor.  EMACS tries to do everything and becomes a hulking slow monster 
in the process.  I'm not knocking EMACS, but TSE is in a whole other class 
for the fast, simple, familiar-to-the-rest-of-us, editor task.

At 08:47 PM 2/17/2003 -0600, you wrote:
>  I don't know how TSE would
>compare to Emacs on a Linux/Unix OS, but leaving out the Emacs kitchen sink
>might give TSE an edge for many tasks.
>Ross Barnes
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Steve Kraus" 
> > >...EMACS is a really good reason
> > > why Sammy should NOT try to implement Tse
> > > under Linux.

--
Jim Sewell Computing Solutions
Key West, Florida, USA

Visit these great sites:
         Covenant" target="new">http://www.covenantwordchurch.org/>Covenant Word Church
         Lighthouse" target="new">http://www.lcachildcare.com/>Lighthouse Christian Academy
        
Hideawayhttp://www.hideawaykeywest.com/>Hideaway;

Cottages - your new home in Key West
         Ultra" target="new">http://www.grandslamkw.com/>Ultra Grand Slam - the most fun 
you'll ever have fishing for the "big ones".



--
TSEPro Mailing List
List Maintenance: www.semware.com/html/list.htm



---
[sawasdi.apana.org.au] (3:800/846.13)